LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Getting wind of proposed turbine rules 

BEAUFORT – Carteret County planners got a look this week at a first draft of proposed rules for wind turbines, but they are letting the public have a say before they finalize anything.

Public meetings will be held in the western, central and eastern areas of the county in May and June to present the proposed rules to the public and get citizen input.

“The more people who are involved, the more people who participate, the better the end result,” said Planning Commission Chairman Harry Archer.

The Carteret County Board of Commissioners in March implemented a nine-month moratorium on electricity generating wind turbines and others tall structures to give county planners time to develop regulations on their development and location.

The moratorium came on the heels of opposition to a proposed wind energy project in the Down East community of Bettie that would put three utility-scale turbines on a 33-acre site off Golden Farm Road.

The county planning staff has developed an early draft of the wind energy section of the new tall structures ordinance and presented it to the planning commission at its meeting Thursday.

Assistant Planning Director Jim Jennings said the staff looked at ordinances adopted in other counties and has primarily modeled the Carteret County rules after an ordinance in Currituck County. The ordinance was recently adopted and was co-developed with the N.C. Wind Energy group.

“This gets the conversation started,” Jennings said after the meeting.

Large-scale wind energy facilities would be regulated separately from small ones used primarily for on-site consumption and would require approval of a Wind Energy Permit Application.

The proposal addresses requirements for minimum lot sizes, setbacks and the height of structures depending on their type.

It limits small, roof-mounted turbines to no more than 60 feet and small systems built on the ground to 75 feet.

For every foot of height, small ground turbines would have to sit 1.5 feet from any property line, public or private right-of-way or access easement and be located on a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet.

A system classified as large would require a minimum of five acres of land and a turbine height limit of 199 feet. The setback would be two feet for every foot of height.

The maximum height of turbines for a utility-scale project would be 500 feet with a 2.5-foot setback for each foot of height. The minimum lot size would be 25 acres.

The planning commission did not discuss the contents of the draft regulations but heard from residents with an interest in the ordinance.

Public safety is a particular concern for Stephanie Miscovich, who lives near the site of the proposed wind energy project in Bettie.

Carteret County sits in a hurricane-prone area and when regulating structures that stand hundreds of feet tall she believes the impacts of high winds at higher altitudes should be given consideration.

She suggested the county also take a look at ordinances for skyscrapers.

Miscovich said the county can have wind energy without putting the public at risk by keeping large utility-scale wind turbines out of residential areas.

“We have plenty of remote area, so this commission can establish regulations that fully protect the public by keeping utility-scale turbines out of residential areas without hindering wind energy development in our county,” she told the board.

Jannette Pippin
Daily News Staff

Jacksonville Daily News

21 April 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky