| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind turbines an eyesore, raise several questions
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
I am a former resident of Cumberland.
Recently while traveling on business I drove from Somerset (Pa.) to Cumberland via U.S. Route 219. While not a “tree hugger” the visual eyesore of 40-story wind turbines atop mountain vistas was disturbing.
The recent article on wind farms and the debate reported by the Times-News leads me to contribute my thoughts while on and after my drive.
1. What value are the residents of the area receiving from these farms?
2. Is this energy remaining local?
3. What amount of generated energy remains if any?
3. If the state leases land where does the money go?
4. What if any community re-investment from a publicly traded company (Clipper Windpower) and a privately held company (US WindForce ) do or will you receive?
5. Does a private landowner selling his property have a responsibility to the community?
Demand an accounting.
I am pro-business but if the answers to the above are little or none my suggestion is to put them in their own backyard and not yours.
Steven Dean
Mount Sterling, Ohio
3 April 2008
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=56361 ]
