LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Energy projects decision put off 

The agency that regulates the state’s coastline voted unanimously last night to delay a decision to establish a one-year moratorium on all alternative energy projects after spending three hours hearing from an expert on ocean energy, asking questions about future planning and listening to questions posed by potential developers.

Grover Fugate, executive director of the Rhode Island Coastal Resources Management Council who proposed the one-year ban on considering offshore energy proposals, said the council needs time to zone state waters in order to find sites that would be appropriate for projects such as wind farms.

The agency will not be ready to permit projects for at least two more years, according to timelines developed by the CRMC and the University of Rhode Island, which will likely be a partner that will collect data on issues from navigational routes and commercial fishing areas to develop a comprehensive offshore use plan.

The purpose of the moratorium, Fugate said, would be to focus CRMC’s attention on completing the plan and avoid any distraction from incoming proposals.

If the state has its guidelines for applicants in place, he said, it will also prevent inappropriate proposals that can waste time or create negative public opinion about renewable energy development.

“One stupid application can cause a lot of problems,” Fugate said.

Some at last night’s meeting disagreed with the recommendation for a moratorium.

Andrew Dzykewicz, the governor’s energy adviser, said he was worried that the moratorium would scare away investors and result in delays and increased costs.

“That [the moratorium] is not a good message to be sending,” he said. “We need to be careful.”

The governor wants Rhode Island to generate 15 percent of its electricity from renewable sources.

Lawmakers have also been pushing to move the state to renewable energy.

Last week, four bills promoting renewable sources were introduced by the Senate President Joseph Montalbano. A bill that may have the most significant long-term impact would require the state’s largest energy provider, National Grid, to enter into contracts with renewable energy providers for a “commercially reasonable” amount of time.

Two potential wind farm investors said they supported the CRMC’s plan to zone offshore waters.

Bill Fischer, who represents New York-based Allco Renewable Energy, aired two concerns to the council.

His company has already submitted an application to build wind turbines in Rhode Island waters and supports the development of a siting plan by the CRMC, but he wanted to make sure the agency’s plans would not be at odds with Allco’s proposal.

He asked that the proposed plan not rule out sites based on cost and that the placement of meteorological towers to gather wind speed data only be placed where wind farms can be built, an issue that is still being decided.

“We are only going for certainty,” Fischer said. “We need the rules.”

The CRMC meets again on March 25.

By Natalie Garcia

Journal Environment Writer

The Providence Journal

12 March 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon