LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm developer to pay costs 

The developer behind plans to build 12 giant wind turbines on land next to Hinkley Point nuclear power station has been told to pay £10,000 costs after taking too long to withdraw an appeal.

West Hinkley Wind Farm Ltd has been ordered to pay the money to West Somerset Council after waiting more than a year to withdraw its appeal against refusal for planning permission for the development.

The council argued it had incurred substantial preparation costs, booked a venue for the inquiry and held the pre-inquiry hearing.

Stacey Beaumont, spokesman for the council, said: “Planning appeal costs are usually borne by the relevant parties themselves regardless of outcome.

“However, under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the Secretary of State can award costs against an appellant or a council only on the grounds of “unreasonable” behaviour, resulting in unnecessary or wasted expense’.

“He held the appellants had a duty to proceed with their appeal responsibly or to withdraw it in good time, before the council incurred preparation costs.”

Tim Howes, chief executive of the council, said: “Preparation for major planning inquiries takes considerable officer and administration time, as well as running up stationery and postage costs.

“We’re sure local people will also be delighted as it is anticipated that this will save our council taxpayers somewhere in the region of £10,000.”

The developer has submitted an amended planning application proposing nine turbines.

By Chris Alder

Somerset County Gazette

4 July 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon