LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

'We are just dumping ground for anything' 

People in a cluster of former mining villages fear they are about to be invaded by huge wind turbines after plans for a mini-windfarm on the Northumberland coast were approved by the Government.

Harworth Power – an offshoot of UK Coal, which owned nearby Ellington Colliery – will be allowed to put up three 110m turbines on the former coal stocking area next to the seaside village of Lynemouth.

Government planning inspector John Braithwaite has allowed the company’s appeal against Castle Morpeth Council’s decision last April to refuse planning permission for the structures.

Mr Braithwaite, who conducted a public inquiry in Lynemouth last month, has concluded that the turbines will not harm the look of the coastal area or hamper regeneration efforts.

Now disappointed villagers in Lynemouth, Ellington, Linton and Cresswell fear the decision makes it more likely that a bigger windfarm – of 13 turbines surrounding the nearby Alcan aluminium smelter – will also be approved by the Government.

The Scottish Power project for 121m turbines was also rejected by Castle Morpeth councillors last year, but the company has appealed and a public inquiry will be held in April.

Many local people have opposed the windfarms, saying they will bring no jobs and stifle efforts to regenerate an area still suffering from the demise of deep mining.

Cath Davidson, who chairs Lynemouth Parish Council and the local partnership group Cell, said the Harworth Power decision had come as no surprise.

“They just see us as a dumping ground for anything. A former parish chairman once said that if Lynemouth didn’t exist, then the authorities would have to invent it to take everything that no one else wants.

“This is the same coastline as Newbiggin and Druridge Bay, so what is the matter with us when it comes to regeneration and being tidied up? We have also opposed the turbines at Alcan, but given this decision, I can’t see that one being refused either.”

Arnold Baker of Cresswell, one of the local borough councillors, said: “I am deeply distressed to hear that this development has been allowed. I fully understand the environmental concerns and that we must, as a nation, constantly seek alternative energy supplies. However, I think it is shameful that three of the biggest windmills in the land can be placed but a stone’s throw from a small village community. This site is right on the coast and it would have been more appropriate to place these turbines out at sea.

“With regard to the Alcan application, I feel our local communities have been let down by the fact that Wansbeck Council has already approved half of the scheme. That makes it more difficult for local people to resist the complete scheme.”

UK Coal spokesman Stuart Oliver said the three turbines would provide enough power for 5,500 homes and become an accepted feature on the skyline. “Obviously, we are pleased with a decision that will support the Government’s objective of getting cleaner and renewable sources of energy.

“This is our second wind turbine scheme to be approved and we believe these three turbines will make a contribution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from other sources of generation.’’

By Dave Black

The Journal

23 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky