LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Reconsider turbine noise calculation 

I salute Joyce Gormel for her powerful and positive letter (2/11). It is encouraging to know there are people like Ms. Gormel who have done independent in-depth research into the worldwide scam (called wind “farms”) perpetrated on this nation.

All town officials in New York must be made aware of the documented medical and acoustical evidence which surrounds the turbine industry, but is withheld from public scrutiny. We here in Clayton are, like the citizens of Cape Vincent, struggling to protect our magnificent area families from the risks of infrasound and low-frequency noise (ILFN). Remember those initials, ILFN.

There are medically proven relationships between ILFN and Vibroacoustic Disease (VAD). The Canadian Renewable Energy Corporation (CREC), which plans to desecrate Wolfe Island, defines VAD as “a syndrome without any potential connection to wind turbines.” They are “unable to find any credible connections between wind turbines and human health impacts.” Nonsense! There is 80 years of concentrated medical documentation which refute that.

The same can be said of lawyers and town supervisors who refuse even to read that the Dba-weighting methodology used by PPM Energy is the wrong method to measure turbine noise, because it does not include the damaging ILFN ranges. It does allow the lawyers and supervisors (Lyme, for instance) to set short setback distances between turbines and the houses of area residents. They ignore the fact that ILFN can and does penetrate walls and windows. It has penetrated them since before the days of the Roman Empire.

Secondly, the setback distances should be measured between the turbines and the property lines, not the houses. The lawyers and supervisors do not own our property lines.

So, my hat’s off to Ms. Gormel and the other good people of both Clayton and the Cape who have the right of eminent research, and the courage and wisdom to use it. Together, we will win.

Thomas H. Murphy

Clayton

Watertown Daily Times

15 February 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky