LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

MP Mick Clapham joins campaigners fighting wind farm plan 

Barnsley West and Penistone MP Mick Clapham has joined a growing band of politicians voicing concern over a controversial wind farm plan.

Mr Clapham has backed the Sheephouse Heights Action Group, which opposes the scheme, and told a meeting of the organisation that “the location is inappropriate”.

Now the MP is to write to Barnsley Council planning officials to request more information about the plan, which would see five wind turbines, each 410 feet high, built on the hillside between Penistone and Stocksbridge.

Hillsborough MP Angela Smith, whose Stocksbridge and Deepcar constituents oppose the plans, has offered the campaigners her unreserved support.

She has already warned ministers they are “sleepwalking” into the destruction of much-loved beauty spots.

Ms Smith also addressed the meeting. She said: “The wind turbines would be overlooking two conservation areas which need to be protected and that point, combined with the fact they will be on the edge of a national park, makes it a very difficult application to support.”

Prospective Conservative parliamentary candidate Spencer Pitfield, who will stand against Angela Smith in the newly refigured Stocksbridge and Penistone constituency at the next election, is also supporting the protest group.

Meanwhile Penistone Town Council, three parish councils, Hunshelf, Oxspring and Langsett, and Stocksbridge Town Council have all objected to the wind farm proposal.

By Gail Robinson

Sheffield Telegraph

28 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky