LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Residents to appeal windmill 

Several Phoenix residents are appealing a decision by the Baltimore County zoning board that would allow a couple to build a 120-foot windmill on their property.

Neighbors say the windmill that Barry and Urszuela Antonelli hope to construct on their 97-acre property on Cooper Road would be an eyesore and would decrease their property values.

“It’s the equivalent of having a 12-story structure in your backyard,” said John Reistrup, a marketing executive and one of the neighbors who is filing the appeal. “We bought our house specifically for the view.”

On Friday, Deputy Zoning Commissioner Thomas H. Bostwick issued an opinion approving the Antonellis’ request. The county does not have formal guidelines pertaining to windmills and considers them accessory structures – similar to garages or sheds – which need approval if they are taller than 15 feet.

This month, the County Council passed a resolution directing the Planning Board to propose amendments that would govern windmills on larger residential tracts. Neighboring Carroll County allows homeowners to build two 150-foot-tall wind turbines on their properties.

The Antonellis say they want the windmill as part of their plan to maintain an ecologically beneficial home, heated and cooled by geothermal energy and powered by wind and solar panels.

Reistrup, his wife and two other families are appealing on grounds that the county did not prove that the Antonellis would suffer a hardship if they were not able to construct the windmill and that the turbine would interfere with views and property values.

J. Carroll Holzer, a lawyer representing the opponents, said the appeal would be filed today with the county’s Permits and Development Management department.

By Julie Scharper
Sun Reporter

The Baltimore Sun

24 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky