LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘Blackpool tower size’ wind turbines denied 

A company behind plans to build wind turbines in the Rotherham countryside has denied claims they could be as tall as Blackpool Tower.

Scores of people have objected to a bid by Chesterfield-based Banks Developments to set up a wind farm at Penny Hill, between Ulley and Thurcroft.

Objectors say the wind farm would be an eyesore too close to people’s homes and too close to the M1 causing a safety hazard.

They have set up an action group to campaign against the plans.

The developers, who have yet to submit a planning application, today said claims the turbines would be as tall as Blackpool Tower were wrong.

Rob Williams, renewables projects director at Banks, said: “The notion that any wind turbines would be as tall as the 158m-high Blackpool Tower is not accurate, and current indications are that turbines with hub heights of around 80 metres will be proposed.

“The public consultation process that we are undertaking is designed to give members of the local community the opportunity to express their opinions around our proposals for Penny Hill, and we will do everything we can to examine and address the issues raised.”

He added public exhibitions in Aston, Ulley and Thurcroft had attracted positive and negative feedback about the plans.

“We are taking this into account as we draw up more detailed plans, which will be exhibited in the autumn in advance of their submission,” he added.

Objector Jeff Blades, of Aughton Lane, Aston, said: “We want to keep our countryside and the wildlife – we don’t want great big industrial windfarms created, we think it’s wrong. I have seen them out in the sea which is an ideal spot for them and there’s plenty of wind for them to operate. People often complain about something after it has happened, but we are going to make it clear we are dead against this from the beginning.”

Another resident Graham Hinchcliffe said: “They are absolutely colossal in size. They would be right next to the motorway and there has been proof wind turbines can cast a shadows across large areas.

“There are eight lanes of traffic there with around 60,000 cars each day so this could cause major problems.”

By Ray Parkin

The Star

22 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky