LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

More doubts over wind turbine; Head of Lambourn Trainers’ Association, Peter Walwyn, calls for public inquiry into plans 

Further doubts have been raised over plans for a Lambourn wind turbine.

The head of Lambourn Trainers’ Association, Peter Walwyn (pictured), has called for a public inquiry into plans to build an 81 metre high wind turbine in Lambourn.

The latest application for permission to build the turbine in Baydon Road, which is in an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), was originally refused in December last year.

Applicant Matthew Partridge, who hopes the turbine will generate electricity for the national grid, is appealing against this decision.

There were objections to the plans when the application was made, and now that an appeal has been lodged, there is a chance for people to send in comments to central government’s Planning Inspectorate.

Mr Walwyn said he wanted to see the case dealt with openly. “I think people in Lambourn are asking for a public inquiry, and I think it is necessary, to discuss the facts,” he said.

He questioned how efficient wind farms are, and called them unsightly.

“We do not need a wind turbine in Lambourn,” he said. “It is the wrong place for one. The turbine would also be next to the M4 motorway, so people would be stopping and staring at it all the time, which may well cause congestion.”

The man behind the plans, Matthew Partridge, said: “We’ve had far more people in support of the turbine than against it. If the plans go ahead, I have an agreement with an energy company for the windmill to be community-owned, so if someone owned a 1% share in it, they would receive 1% of the profits.

“There is a wind farm in Oxfordshire that works like this, and I hold shares in it.”

He said his reason for lodging the appeal was that planning policy has changed since his last application. “You are now able to have up to four wind turbines in an AONB,” he said. “There is also a policy that you should have renewable energy sources near transport links, and you can’t get much closer to a transport link than right next to the M4 motorway.”

Comments on the appeal can be made in writing to the inspectorate by August 19.

By Clare Hardy, Reporter

Newbury Today

18 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky