LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County Durham villagers in turbine protest 

Villagers are protesting about plans to build wind turbines less than a quarter of a mile from their homes.

More than 100 objections have been lodged by locals to the proposals for the site in Hawthorn, Cold Hesledon and East Murton, County Durham.

They fear the noise of the turbines will be too intrusive and are concerned the flicker effect from the turbines’ giant blades could cause car accidents or even epileptic fits.

Objector Paul Paterson said: “They should be built a minimum of a mile away from peoples’ houses. If it goes ahead then one of them will be only 450 metres from my house.

“One house will be less than 300 metres away from a turbine.”

To highlight their concerns the protesters handed the Sunday Sun a DVD showing the effect of wind turbines in the nearby village of Seaton.

The short film shows heavy shadows from the blades sweeping over the inside and outside of the houses.

Mr Paterson said: “The government is on a bandwagon and local planners are being encouraged to look favourably upon the application.”

David Hobbs, case officer for Easington District Council which is dealing with the application, said: “We are not at liberty to discuss applications.”

But Mr Paterson may be the least of the council’s worries, as the Ministry of Defence has also registered protests, saying the proposed turbines would interfere with radars at the nearby bases RAF Leeming and RAF Spadeadam.

by Ruari O Toole

Sunday Sun

6 July 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky