LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Legal challenge on Redcar wind farm plan 

A council fighting controversial plans for a wind farm off the North East coast today criticised as “unlawful” the failure of the Government to hold a public inquiry.

Lawyers fighting the case at the High Court in London said Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, John Hutton, was wrong not to direct a full inquiry.

Mr Hutton gave his consent for the construction of the farm by EDF Energy, last September, paving the way for 30 massive turbines to be built around a mile off the coast at Redcar.

But Redcar and Cleveland Council objects to the farm’s construction, following thousands of objections from residents opposed to the plans.

Today, lawyers representing the council launched a legal challenge to the Minister’s decision before Mr Justice Sullivan in a High Court hearing expected to last two days.

Geoffrey Stephenson, for the council, said Mr Hutton had acted “unlawfully” in failing to carry out his statutory duty to consider whether a public inquiry into the plans, which were several years old by the time they were given consent, was appropriate.

He added EDF’s application for consent was “invalid” as it was only for part of a “generating station”, not including the vital on-shore sub-station, transformers and cabling.

The law permits only applications for whole stations, meaning the Minister’s grant of consent was “invalid”, he argued.

The wind farm plans involve 30 turbines, up to 132 metres above the high-water mark, standing in rows of ten, approximately 300 metres apart.

Objectors say the turbines would be too close to the shoreline and could overwhelm the town.

By Elaine Blackburne

Evening Gazette

gazettelive.co.uk

30 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky