LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Judge rules against opponents of Cape Wind 

A Barnstable Superior Court judge last Friday dismissed four of five counts in a lawsuit that challenges the state’s environmental review of the Cape Wind project – a proposal to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound.

The action voided the bulk of the lawsuit filed last August by the town of Barnstable, the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, a group opposed to Cape Wind, and ten concerned taxpayers.

The lawsuit was filed after the state’s Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs approved Cape Wind’s environmental impact report, a significant decision that opened the door for other state agencies to issue permits for the project. The lawsuit claimed that the state’s review of the project was flawed and did not adequately address potential impacts.

Audra Parker, the director of strategic planning for the Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, said it appears that the judge considered portions of the lawsuit premature. Opponents, she said, needed to wait until after an actual permit was issued before challenging the state in court.

“I think it is more of an issue of the timing of the legal challenge than substance,” Parker said. “But we are consulting our lawyers so we will have a better answer for you in the future.”

In a press release, Cape Wind president Jim Gordon said he was pleased with the ruling.

“The court rejected the opponents’ primary argument and agreed that Massachusetts agency review was proper,” Gordon said.

Judge Robert Kane did not dismiss the suit entirely, keeping alive a portion of the complaint that alleges the project would violate the endangered species act because an administrative appeal is still underway with the Department of Fish and Wildlife.

The US Minerals Management Service, the lead federal agency charged with approving the project in federal waters, is presently preparing a final environmental impact statement about the project. That document is due to be released by the end of the year, an MMS spokesperson said.

Issues related to Cape Wind also are being reviewed by the state’s Energy Facilities Siting Board, which may issue rulings on pending motions by the end of the month, according to a spokesperson for the board.

wgbh.org

24 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon