LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Town faces tall order as it decides fate of windmill 

GALLATIN- The town has closed the public hearing on an application for a zoning variance that would permit construction of a 135-foot-tall wind turbine at Buckwheat Bridge Angoras. But a decision on the controversial proposal is not likely for at least another month.

The hearing was closed Tuesday night, June 10, by Richard Humphries, the acting chairman of the town Zoning Board of Appeals. A variance is required for the wind turbine because the town zoning law sets a height limit of 75 feet.

The application for the variance was filed by Dr. Daniel Melamed, a urologist, who owns Buckwheat Bridge Angoras, a 200-acre farm at 111 Kozlowski Road. He raises angora goats and Cormo sheep at the farm and wants the wind turbine to generate electricity to augment the power needed to operate the farm’s solar-powered spinning mill, where mohair and fiber from the animals are processed into wool and yarn.

The wool and yarn are farm products sold along with socks made from the materials.

Dr. Melamed says he needs more power than is supplied by his existing solar panels to operate the mill on a more full-time basis. He has said that adding solar panels is not an option.

To achieve the minimum 10 mph wind speed necessary to generate the electricity he needs, as well as to qualify for a New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) grant and keep the turbine operating efficiently, Dr. Melamed’s wind turbine needs to be 120 feet high at the hub, which is what he proposes. The turbine spins and generates current when wind strikes its 3 blades, each of them 15 feet long blades. As each blade reaches the top of its arc, the full height of the apparatus would be 135 feet above the ground.

On-site wind data provided by Dr. Melamed has been analyzed by the town’s engineering consultant, Ray Jurkowski of Morris Associates. The data support the height and wind speed requirements presented by Dr. Melamed, Mr. Jurkowski told the board.

The consultant also said that the wind turbine would not generate noise greater than “ambient” levels: 50 decibels during the day and 40 decibels at night.

In answer to a question from town resident Ira Levy, Mr. Jurkowski said that it is possible that an on-site wind speed test at a height of 75 feet height might also measure a 10 mph wind speed.

Bob Somers, manager of the Farm Land Protection Unit at the state Department of Agriculture and Markets, said that NYSERDA, which has “set up the safety standards and done the research” calls 10 mph “the break even number.”

At wind speeds less than 10 mph “it will take 20 years to pay back the system, and that would not be advantageous,” said Mr. Somers.

He said that that NYSERDA relies on wind information from a private company called AWS True Wind Data, which he said is more accurate than on-site data. AWS data is based on measurements taken over many years by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, a federal agency.

The state Department of Agriculture and Markets supports the wind turbine application.

Residents who live near the proposed wind turbine site expressed a number of concerns including:

*The structure will attract lightning that will ultimately damage their property

*Sun reflecting off the spinning blades will create a flickering effect in their houses

*Noise generated by the wind turbine will be amplified by the surrounding terrain.

Though the wind turbine application has been before the ZBA since October 2006, the board will not begin its deliberations on the application until June 24 at 6:30 p.m., when a workshop session is slated with the board’s special council on the matter Attorney Robert Fitzsimmons and Engineer Jurkowski. The public is welcome to attend that session but will not be permitted to comment.

By Diane Valden

The Independent

zwire.com

11 June 2008

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky