LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lawyer’s Pay Adds To Wind Debate 

The latest conflict centers around a lawyer hired to represent the town whose fees will be reimbursed by the wind developer.

The controversy over a proposed commercial wind farm, which has pitted neighbor against neighbor in this small town of about 730 people, continues.

The latest conflict centers around a lawyer hired to represent the town whose fees will be reimbursed by the wind developer.

Both sides of the debate agreed during meetings of the Sheffield Board of Selectmen that the town needed an attorney to represent its interests in dealing with a wind developer over how much the town would receive in taxes if the project goes through. UPC Vermont Wind announced its plans to erect 20 398-foot wind turbines between Hardscrabble Mountain, Granby Mountain and Libby Hill in early October.

Six more turbines are slated for neighboring Sutton near Norris Mountain.

The town turned to the Vermont League of Cities and Towns for advice. They were told a model ordinance does allow for selectmen to hire professional help and were given a list of lawyers the league recommended. The lawyer everyone agreed upon was Montpelier attorney Richard Saudek, former commissioner of the Vermont Department of Public Service.

"In most cases, the town bills the developer for professional help," Dominic Cloud, director of the Municipal Assistance Center, said this week.

Since the town has no money in its budget for legal advice, selectmen turned to UPC which offered to put up $4,000 to pay Saudek. Max Aldrich, chairman of the board of selectmen, said the town agreed to the deal "as long as there were no strings attached."

"I thought it was common practice," Aldrich said. He added that representatives from both sides of the issue have been present at meetings between Saudek and UPC.

"We’ve been as open about this as we possibly can," he said.

But Greg Bryant, who has been very vocal about his opposition to the wind project, said he is not happy with the deal.

"We do have a problem with it," Bryant said. "It puts the lawyer in a hard spot because the money is coming from UPC."

Bryant said he and other members of a group opposing the project have no problem with Saudek because he was their choice. But Bryant said Saudek is trying to get more money for the town from the wind developer while he and others do not want the wind farm at all at any price.

During a meeting of selectmen in October, Saudek made it clear he is working for the town.

"My complete loyalty is to the town," Saudek said at the time.

Tim Caffyn, project manager for UPC, said his company had no input as to who the town hired as an attorney.

"The town needed help," Caffyn said. "It’s a difficult, complex issue, so we agreed to give the town four grand." He added that Saudek has been a "tough" negotiator.

Non-Binding Vote Thursday

This latest debate comes just days before a town vote is scheduled to take place to see how residents feel about the wind farm. The non-binding vote will take place Thursday at the Sheffield Town Hall at 7 p.m. Townspeople had hoped to have some solid figures from UPC before casting their votes. While the results are not binding, Aldrich said he will listen to the people.

"I’ve said from the get-go I would go with the majority," Aldrich said. "I don’t want to go back on my word."

In the meantime, more pro- and anti-wind signs are going up on lawns throughout the town. Advertisements have been placed in The Caledonian-Record both touting and condemning the wind turbines.

UPC has hired Spike Advertising of Richmond, Vt., to handle the advertising campaign. Opponents’ ads state they are being paid for by a Sheffield person. A telephone campaign is also under way encouraging people to vote.

UPC plans to file for a certificate of public good from the Vermont Public Service Board in late December or early January. Company officials expect the permit process to take until 2007.

http://www.caledonianrecord.com/pages/local_news/story/e6b5a80cd

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon