LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Upon further review, PSC approves Highland wind farm 

Credit:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | September 26, 2013 | www.jsonline.com ~~

After initially rejecting the plan, state energy regulators gave the go-ahead Thursday for Emerging Energies of Wisconsin to build a $250 million wind farm in St. Croix County

The state Public Service Commission approved the Highland Wind Farm in a 2-to-1 vote, with commission Chairman Phil Montgomery joining Eric Callisto in supporting the project, and commissioner Ellen Nowak voting against it.

Nowak and Montgomery had rejected the plan earlier this year, saying the developer hadn’t shown it was able to comply with the state’s noise standard for wind turbines.

But Montgomery and Callisto had opened the door to Emerging Energies to show how it could comply with the standard, and the developer followed up, indicating it could comply with the standard by curtailing some of the turbines at night.

Montgomery said Thursday he was satisfied with the developer’s curtailment plan, but wanted to see documentation that the wind turbines are programmed to meet the noise standard – and that the project developers follow up “with adequate measurement and monitoring.”

The PSC decided to doubled the number of sound monitors that would measure compliance with the state noise standard, and to require more sound monitoring four times a year. The commission also left the door open to requiring further action if the project results in noise complants.

Montgomery and commissioner Eric Callisto said the sound modeling used in the project was conservative and is likely to over-predict the amount of noise the project will generate.

The developer released a statement Thursday afternoon, saying in part: “Commissioner Montgomery set high standards for us to meet and gave us another chance to prove that we were able to comply with the state’s noise standard for wind turbines. “Our work will continue as we understand the emotional nature of this exhaustive debate. EEW will mend relationships, produce clean energy and put people to
work.”

If the project moves forward to construction, the Highland Wind Farm would consist of up to 44 wind turbines, generating 102.5 megawatts of electricity. It would be built in the towns of Forest and Cylon, nearly 60 miles northwest of Eau Claire.

Peter McKeever, a lawyer for Forest Voice, a group that mobilized to oppose the project, said the group will need to review the commission’s final decision before deciding whether to file an appeal in court.

“Forest Voice is disappointed that a majority of the Public Service Commission did not discuss many of the evidentiary issues that were raised, but remains optimistic of ultimately prevailing,” he said. “The proposed project will harm the health and safety of many of the residents of the community and rob them of the value of their properties. Until wind projects are properly sited, they will remain controversial.”

The conservation group Clean Wisconsin praised the vote. “Today’s decision is a victory for cleaner air and water in Wisconsin,” said Katie Nekola, the group’s general counsel, said in a statement. “The Highland Wind project will supply enough clean, safe electricity to power hundreds of homes and businesses, and will displace dirty coal power.”

Source:  By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel | September 26, 2013 | www.jsonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky