LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Richfield vote drama goes down to the wire 

The contest could also have a significant impact on the debate over whether a wind farm consisting of six towering turbines should be constructed in the town. Enjem has balked at signing a proposed community host agreement, saying the document fails to adequately protect the town’s long-term interests. Palevsky has said the project would benefit the region’s economy. However, in a letter to the editor he sent to The Daily Star last month, he indicated he is neutral on the project. Urtz has also promoted the wind farm.

Credit:  By Joe Mahoney Staff Writer | The Daily Star | September 20, 2013 | thedailystar.com ~~

In the event of a tie vote in the Republican primary for Richfield town supervisor, the outcome would translate into a “failure to nominate” and the town’s GOP committee would have the the authority to choose the nominee, officials said Thursday.

Incumbent Supervisor Fran Enjem holds a one-vote lead over challenger Nicholas Palevsky, who had been endorsed by the town’s Republican Committee headed by Donald Urtz, also chairman of the town Planning Board.

Officials said the final vote, an affidavit ballot filed by a woman whose eligibility to vote was questioned on the day of the primary, will be examined this afternoon at the Otsego County Board of Elections office in Cooperstown. Officials had said earlier in the week that they expected the vote to be opened on Thursday, but they amended that scenario during the day.

The voter in question lives in the Oneonta area, her mother told The Daily Star. However, her mother confirmed that her daughter uses her Richfield Springs mailing address and stops there about once a week to pick up mail. The voter could not be reached for comment.

A spokesman for the state Board of Elections said a voter does not need to live full-time in a town to vote there. The voter only needs to have “a significant and continuing tie to that address,” said John Conklin, the spokesman.

The Richfield Republican primary outcome will determine who the next town supervisor will be because there is no Democratic candidate in the November general election. The contest could also have a significant impact on the debate over whether a wind farm consisting of six towering turbines should be constructed in the town.

Enjem has balked at signing a proposed community host agreement, saying the document fails to adequately protect the town’s long-term interests. Palevsky has said the project would benefit the region’s economy. However, in a letter to the editor he sent to The Daily Star last month, he indicated he is neutral on the project. Urtz has also promoted the wind farm.

The mother of the voter in question said she was uncertain as to whether her daughter voted for Enjem or Palevsky and did not know how her daughter stood on the controversial wind farm project.

Enjem said he would have probably filed an objection to the yet-to-be opened affidavit ballot had he been advised that he had to do so on Tuesday. A county Board of Elections official said he and other candidates were sent a letter in July advising them that any objections must be filed on Sept. 17. Sheila Ross, the county’s Republican elections commissioner, said it is now too late.

Source:  By Joe Mahoney Staff Writer | The Daily Star | September 20, 2013 | thedailystar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon