LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Power Siting Board to consider wind rehearing applications 

Credit:  Citizen Staff Report | Urbana Daily Citizen | 9/10/2013 | urbanacitizen.com ~~

COLUMBUS – The Buckeye Wind II project will be discussed during the Sept. 30 Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) meeting.

OPSB spokesperson Matt Butler said the board will address the merits of timely-filed applications for rehearing by the Champaign County Commission, the townships of Goshen, Union and Urbana, and citizens group Union Neighbors United (UNU).

During its May 28 meeting, the board approved a certificate allowing for the construction of this second phase of the Buckeye Wind farm. Combined with the first phase, more than 100 wind turbines are proposed to be constructed in eastern Champaign County.

Following the board’s decision, the county, the city of Urbana and UNU filed applications for rehearings. Administrative Law Judge Mandy W. Chiles granted the county and UNU’s applications in July for the purpose of giving the board more time to consider issues presented in the applications.

The city’s application was not mentioned in the entry granting these applications. Project applicant Champaign Wind LLC in July filed a motion to strike against the city, arguing that the city’s application missed the deadline to file for rehearing.

Butler said the board will address the city of Urbana’s application for rehearing.

An amendment to the first phase of the project is pending before the OPSB. Six entities have intervened the amendment.

Source:  Citizen Staff Report | Urbana Daily Citizen | 9/10/2013 | urbanacitizen.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky