LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm opposition 

Tilting at Windmills” on May 18 may have left some readers unaware that there are factual reasons for intelligent, well-adjusted people to oppose the construction of wind turbine complexes in the county. Conflict lies between those who wish to preserve the natural character of large tracts of undeveloped land and those who do not care or are among the few who will benefit financially from turbines.

Large tracts of land in its natural state become scarcer every year. Attractive natural landscapes provide both financial benefits to the tourist industry and non-financial quality-of-life benefits.

Wind turbine complexes generate modest financial benefits to a few locally and huge profits to giant players on the world financial stage. This is the real trade-off, not the environment. Even the widest foreseeable use of wind power will not reduce America’s oil dependence.

The cited $2 million payment toward the townships is misleading. The proposed $67,000 annual payment to Jackson Township actually amounts to less than $14 per resident per month – less than one restaurant meal! Furthermore, to accommodate heavy equipment the townships will likely incur additional road widening, straightening and maintenance costs, which the wind energy company has no obligation to pay. And, we do not know what the township will do with any balance that might remain.

Allowing all parties to testify about a nearby major ($111 million) land development stretching over seven miles is a duty of a government, not a “dog and pony show”.

If conducting hearings is too expensive, the county should charge the applicant, the party causing the additional expenses.

There is no need to allow wind turbines in agricultural or resource protection zones. There is no need to guide developers of wind turbine projects. Legally, their facilitation is not a function of the Planning Commission.

Arthur Plaxton

Jackson Township

Williamsport Sun-Gazette

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky