LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Secretary of State to have the final say on Wolds wind farm plan 

Credit:  By Trudi Davidson | Hull Daily Mail | August 02, 2013 | www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk ~~

Controversial plans for six wind turbines near a Yorkshire Wolds stately home will be decided by Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Eric Pickles.

The scheme has been called in for a Government decision following a public inquiry this week into the scheme for Thornholme Field, near Burton Agnes Hall.

Planning inspector Paul Griffiths, who chaired the inquiry, will send his report to the Communities and Local Government Secretary for the final say.

After hearing evidence from would-be developers Wind Prospect Development Ltd and East Riding Council, which refused permission, the inspector visited Burton Agnes Hall and the surrounding area to view the landscape.

Martin Carter, for the council, had told the inquiry views of the turbines would be a distracting feature, “competing with the hall’s architectural dominance for the viewer’s attention”.

He said: “The appeal site is not in some quiet backwater of the countryside but can fairly be said to be in a focus of activity for local people and visitors.

“The visual effects of the proposal need to be assessed in that context.

“The experience of turbines by visitors to Burton Agnes Hall will not be gained merely from the hall and its grounds and its picnic site at the car park, but will be an important element of their experience as they arrive and depart to, depending upon their route and means of transport.”

Mr Carter argued the adverse effects of the scheme were not simply those all commercial wind energy schemes would bring.

He claimed the scheme would result in “particular harm to the character of the local landscape”, as well as eroding living conditions for a number of local residents.

Marcus Trinick, QC for Wind Prospect Developments Limited, insisted very great care had been taken to ensure heritage assets would be properly conserved.

He said: “It has never been claimed that the need for renewable energy automatically over-rides environmental protections and the planning concerns of local communities.”

Mr Trinick said since visitors to Burton Agnes Hall would experience their visit within the hall rather than when arriving and leaving, the impact on the stately home had been “significantly over-claimed”.

He said: “With regard to Burton Agnes Hall, it is agreed between the witnesses that harm would be occasioned but not substantial harm.”

Mr Trinick argued the scheme was acceptable.

He said: “The very fact there are no issues that remain for examination in relation to aviation, national designations for landscape or nature conservation reasons, international designations, noise or indeed cultural heritage, are in my view material factors which should weigh in favour of the development in the overall balance.

“The absence of any issues other than landscape and visual concerns itself goes to the issue of acceptability.”

The Secretary of State is expected to rule on the appeal towards the end of the year, after he has considered the planning inspector’s report from the inquiry.

Source:  By Trudi Davidson | Hull Daily Mail | August 02, 2013 | www.thisishullandeastriding.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon