LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bolsover: Wind farm plan is rejected 

Credit:  Chad | 20 July 2013 | www.chad.co.uk ~~

A wind farm planning application to erect six turbines on land near Palterton has been rejected by Bolsover District Council’s planning committee.

Over 100 people packed into the council chamber during a meeting on Wednesday, July 17, to hear the proposal by Roseland Community Windfarm LLP to construct six wind turbines with blade tip heights of 126.5m, a 1 80m anemometer mast, a control building and substation on land east, south and west of Roseland Wood Scarcliffe.

The Planning Committee had the chance to hear from several speakers, for and against the proposal, before making their decision on the proposal.

Objectors raised concerns over the potential damaging effects on the local heritage assets and conservation areas, health problems and questioned the grants being proposed by the development.

Palterton and Community Action Group and others had raised similar concerns.

The applicants stated that the development would create £750k profit per year which would be re-invested into the community for their benefit and that the scheme had been reduced over time to help mitigate affects and harm to local heritage assets.

Councillors deliberated the decision, before rejecting the application by a vote of 11 against and 4 for on the grounds that it would have a significant detrimental impact on the local heritage assets in the landscape of the Limestone region and the impacts to these heritage assets outweighed the financial benefits that were offered.

Source:  Chad | 20 July 2013 | www.chad.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky