LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Concerns about wind turbines 

Credit:  The Daily Advocate, dailyadvocate.com 8 June 2011 ~~

Several weeks ago a group of concerned citizens met with two representatives from enXco. We discussed our concerns about wind turbines. Two of our concerns were shadow flicker and noise. When the blades come between the sun and an object, they cast a shadow which constantly moves as they turn in the wind. It can last up to 45 minutes a day. The enXco representatives told us that the location of the turbines were negotiable with the farmers in regard to noise and shadow flicker. We were lead to believe they would not be a problem.

However, I have obtained a copy of one of their contracts. The contract states, “Lessee (enXco) shall have the right to emit or cause the emission of noise, vibration, air turbulence, wake, and electromagnetic and frequency interference and to permit wind turbulence, to overhang, cast shadows, or cause flicker onto the Property and/or impact Lessor’s (farmer’s) views of and from the Property.” It sounds to me like shadow flicker and noise are still problems in spite of “negotiating” the location of the turbines. I also see enXco protecting themselves against problems with T.V. and radio reception as well as low frequency sound waves. If they were not problems, these items would not be included in their contracts.

To learn more about wind turbines, go to our web site www.dcwindworrriers.com. Be informed before it’s too late!

JoAnn Hawkey

Greenville

Source:  The Daily Advocate, dailyadvocate.com 8 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky