Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
50 pro-wind signs stolen in Rumford
Credit: By Terry Karkos, Staff Writer, Sun Journal, www.sunjournal.com 7 June 2011 ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
RUMFORD – Police are investigating the theft of blue and white political signs asking people to “Vote Yes to Wind Energy” and to “Vote Yes on the Wind Ordinance.”
More than three dozen signs that were placed Monday along Route 108 and from Rumford Center to the bottom of Falls Hill on Route 2, were gone by Tuesday morning, said J. Arthur Boivin, who helped place the signs along the roadways.
“This is totally ridiculous and illegal as hell,” said Boivin, who with another man, was going around replacing the missing signs Tuesday.
Taking, defacing or disturbing political signs is a civil violation with a possible fine of up to $250 per sign.
Boivin said 50 signs were taken. Some had the paper sign ripped off the metal frame and the frame left standing; two were yanked up and thrown onto a baseball field. But most were simply gone.
“To me, these signs say Rumford is open for business” if the ordinance is approved, Boivin said.
Police Sgt. Douglas Maifeld said Tuesday that they had no suspects.
“Apparently, people don’t have anything better to do,” Maifeld said. “If you don’t like the message on a sign, then vote against it; don’t steal the sign.”
Town Manager Carlo Puiia said the signs were still in place Monday night when he was returning home from the town business meeting which ended at 9:30 p.m.
“There’s still some around town, but there’s a number of them that were removed without authorization,” Puiia said.
“It’s troubling. It’s one thing to think that it’s a random act of vandalism or an act of some of the opposition that were probably upset or concerned about First Wind’s placing the signs out,” he said.
The signs were paid for by Boston-based wind developer First Wind, which has had a $65 million wind farm project on hold for two years to allow Rumford to draft an ordinance to regulate such development.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: