LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Meeting wasn't stacked; A 'few' NMEPC members were invited to FWFN 

Credit:  The Chronicle-Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com 4 June 2011 ~~

Horizon’s claim, as reported in The Chronicle-Journal editorial June 3, that “roughly half of the people present (were) members of the Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee (NMEPC)” is grossly exaggerated.
The few NMEPC members in attendance were personally invited by the FWFN members as observers only.
Horizon’s previous “open” houses required attendees to sign in and be videotaped prior to being allowed entry. Why wasn’t this procedure followed for the FWFN “open” house?
By suspending the mandatory sign-in and videotaping, Horizon can now inaccurately claim it was stacked with non-aboriginals from the NMEPC. How can they make this claim without proof? Were all non-aboriginals considered members of the NMEPC? How did they determine this number?
This misinformation comes from a direct quote from Horizon Wind’s local public relations firm and is an insult to First Nation citizens who were clearly in command and communicating their concerns regarding this project. In no way were NMEPC attempting to influence FWFN opinion and to suggest otherwise is to further insult FWFN’s ability to form their own opinion on this proposed industrial project on their traditional lands.
Was there misinformation? Absolutely.
We now know that that is no longer the original eight-turbine project located past Big Thunder, but rather up to 40 turbines located on Mount Johnson and near Sawdust Lake.
As well, in the latter stages, the turbines will be in excess of 650 feet, the size of Mt. Johnson itself.
This is another example of how Horizon and their public relations attempt to divide communities.
I congratulate those FWFN members who had the courage to speak and convey their heartfelt concerns and love of their land and traditional ways. A diverse group from elders to the children spoke from the heart and I commend them!
Irene Bond
Nor’Wester Mountain Escarpment Protection Committee
Thunder Bay

Source:  The Chronicle-Journal, www.chroniclejournal.com 4 June 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky