LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Prospect wind farm proposal rejected 

Credit:  By Brad Kane, www.hartfordbusiness.com 12 May 2011 ~~

The Connecticut Siting Council on Thursday afternoon rejected a proposal to build the state’s first commercial wind farm in Prospect, saying the turbines would mar the landscape.

The council, which accepts or rejects all power plant proposals in the state, voted 7-2 to reject the petition from West Hartford developer BNE Energy. The plan called for two 500-foot industrial turbines in Prospect.

The council was most concerned about the environmental impact of the tall turbines, specifically the visual effects on the scenery in Prospect, said Linda Roberts, siting council executive director.

BNE Energy has 45 days to appeal to Connecticut Superior Court.

The developer also has two proposals for wind farms in Colebrook pending before the siting council. The decisions on those petitions are expected June 4 and June 11. Many of the same issues regarding scenery have been mentioned in the Colebrook debate.

Shortly after BNE Energy made its wind farm proposals to the siting council, the General Assembly’s Energy & Technology Committee took up the cause and passed legislation placing a moratorium on all wind projects in the state. The same legislation called on Connecticut to develop regulations regarding wind farms, which would be the only source of power generation in Connecticut with specific state regulations.

The full body of the General Assembly hasn’t acted on that legislation yet.

Source:  By Brad Kane, www.hartfordbusiness.com 12 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky