LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Voters reject municipal turbine project after years of debate 

Credit:  By Doug Fraser, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 3 May 2011 ~~

BREWSTER – It took two hours of testimony both for and against the municipal wind project, before voters finally had their say and they said no, even if it was by the narrowest of margins.

Under the town’s municipal wind bylaw, the planning board is supposed to be the decider in granting a special permit for municipal wind turbines. But earlier this winter, the planning board deadlocked on a motion to deny the project a permit.

Selectmen could have appealed what is effectively a denial in court. They chose instead to submit an article at town meeting that removed the requirement for a special permit for municipal turbines in the town’s lone industrial zone.

Of the 1,136 people who voted on the article, 725 voted in the affirmative, but the measure failed by 25 votes to attain the required two-thirds majority.

And so it looks like the Cape & Vineyard Electric Cooperative, which proposed the twin turbines and would have funded their construction and operation, will likely not see their first successful wind power project after almost four years of trying and a number of failed attempts that cost them hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Brewster, in turn, lost out on an opportunity for a new source of revenues as CVEC had proposed paying the town an estimated $100,000 a year for a lease as well as discounted municipal power.

While some decried the selectmen’s article as an end-run around due process, time was not on their side, explained Town Administrator Charles Sumner.

A court appeal would have taken over a year and town officials feared other proposed projects in other towns could use up the limited amount of power that can receive favorable reimbursements from NStar.

But resident Mitch Relin posited that the vote had less to do with wind turbines and more to do with trust.

Board of selectmen chairman Ed Lewis pointed out that every committee and commission in town voted unanimously to support the project, up to the planning board’s vote.

“This was not a power move, or sneaky. Selectmen believe the Brewster voters deserve the right to be heard,” Lewis said.

But for others, issues of due process took a back seat to the bigger picture – the toll that conventional power generation was taking on the environment.

“Every decision to turn down a windmill is one to allow more coal fumes to go up smokestacks and descend on us. Impacts from this are far worse than the impacts of any windmill,” said Liam Mahony.

Still, others worried about the health effects of noise and shadows from the big blades, known as flicker.

“Our property will be devalued, our property is in the flicker zone,” Rick Judd said.

Voters passed the elementary school budget override, Nauset Regional School budget override, and a town operating budget override.

Together they totaled nearly $800,000, an amount that will also have to pass at the town election on May 17.

Source:  By Doug Fraser, Cape Cod Times, www.capecodonline.com 3 May 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon