LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Committee kills stricter rules for wind farms 

Credit:  By Heather J. Carlson, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 28 April 2011 ~~

ST. PAUL – Wind farm supporters and opponents packed a House committee room on Wednesday facing off on whether stricter setbacks for large-scale wind projects are needed to protect landowners.

The debate centered on a bill introduced by Red Wing Republican Rep. Tim Kelly. The measure would require that in areas that have at least 3 1/2 homes per square mile, wind turbines could not be built within a half-mile of the property line of a landowner who was not participating in the wind project. Kelly said research shows that at this population density opposition to wind farm projects increases dramatically. He said he believes that is part of the problem in Goodhue County where a large number of citizens are protesting proposed wind projects.

“As we move further and further down this road, we are starting to encroach on areas that may just not be the right place (for wind turbines),” Kelly said.

But representatives from wind farm companies argue that this bill would prevent several projects in the state from moving ahead and put a chilling effect on wind energy in the state. Blake Nixon, president of Geronimo Wind Energy, told members of the House Agriculture and Rural Policy Committee that wind development provides good paying jobs in rural areas.

Read in Thursday’s print edition what others say are concerns about wind development.

Source:  By Heather J. Carlson, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 28 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky