LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Big wind wrong energy solution 

Credit:  Burlington Free Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 24 April 2011 ~~

I have been following the Lowell wind project since the start of talks more than eight years ago. I agree that we need more renewable energy in the state but do not think that wind is the way to go. Wind turbines are very expensive to build and only have a life of up to 20 years. The big push for them at this time, I believe, is due to the fact that the federal subsidies for wind projects runs out at the end of 2012. Without the subsidies, turbines would be too expensive to consider (each turbine costs upward of $1 million per megawatt to build. It costs even more to get it on the grid but the figures vary on that because they have to have new lines and such in a lot of places).

In a time when many of our federal and state programs are being cut and our national debt is at an all time high, I ask “can we afford to build these turbines in a place that relies heavily on tourism for its livelihood?” Would you want to go camping in an area where you hear the whooshing of the blades whenever the wind blows?

This will affect everyone. If revenue is lost from one area, either taxes will need to be raised, more programs will need to be cut, or both. Electric rates will go up and more people will need assistance paying their bills.

If the Lowell project goes through, you can be guaranteed that there are more waiting to follow closely behind it. Can we afford the cost of such an unreliable energy source?

KELLEY LIND
Winooski

Source:  Burlington Free Press, www.burlingtonfreepress.com 24 April 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky