LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbines can cause sleepless nights 

As someone who has serious concerns about the close proximity to my cottage of the proposed Catamount/Force 9 Energy wind farm at Barmoor, I find the opinions of Wildwood (“Have Your Say”, Voice of the North, May 21) ill-mannered and condescending.

He/she states that: “Wind farms are not noisy. This is just another myth used by nimbys.” If turbines are not noisy, why has the turbine nearest my home had to be, to quote the environmental statement, “modelled with modified operations” to achieve “acceptable” noise levels at my home and one other property?

Is he/she suggesting that Jane and Julian Davis of Deeping St Nicholas in Lincolnshire are lying about their situation (“The noise that drives us mad”: The Journal, April 28)? Why would anyone choose to pay out pounds 600 per month to get a decent night’s sleep in a rented property if they could sleep undisturbed in their own home?

The nearest turbine to my cottage would be less than 750m away, closer even than those causing problems to the Davis family. What guarantee do I have that this turbine and others closer than 900m would not cause sleepless nights?

I too have visited wind farms. My assessment of the noise situation of those in the Lammermuir Hills differs from that of Wildwood.

At 740m there was a constant whoosh and thud of the rotating blades, a high pitched buzzing like a swarm of angry bees, an irregular grinding and a loud perpetual squeaking, presumably due to lack of lubrication. Wildwood, it seems, would find this constant noise acceptable but I suspect that he/she will never have to face the reality of turbines right outside their home.

I respectfully suggest that Wildwood reads “Noise radiation from wind turbines installed near homes: Effects on health” by Frey and Hadden before using the derogatory term nimby to describe people like me who have valid concerns about the close proximity of proposed wind turbines to their homes.

A FERGUSON, Bowsden, Northumberland

Source: The Journal – Newcastle-upon-Tyne

redorbit.com

23 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky