LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Clifton residents strengthen land use ordinance 

Credit:  By Nok-Noi Ricker, BDN Staff, Bangor Daily News, bangordailynews.com 20 March 2011 ~~

CLIFTON, Maine – The bulk of Saturday’s annual town meeting dealt with 14 amendments to the inch-thick land use ordinance put into place last June, and two involving the definition of a residence spurred quite a bit of discussion.

Peter Beckford, who is a member of the Clifton Taskforce on Wind and the closest neighbor to a proposed wind farm on Pisgah Mountain, said that adding a definition for residence that excludes hunting and other types of camps and changing the wording from structures to protected locations in effect “makes those camps worthless.”

Planning board member Bruce Jellison said to the 30 or so residents at the annual town meeting that the line Beckford and others were concerned about will be removed.

“Yes, we should have worded it different,” Jellison said. “We will take that line out of this ordinance.”

The line, which is part of the definition for residence, reads, “A structure intended as occasional, temporary living quarters; such as a hunting cabin, is not a residence.”

The wind energy amendments were created to clarify issues and make the land use code tougher, Jellison said.

“The thought here was to enact an even stricter standard,” he said.

After a short discussion about articles 32 and 35, residents decided to endorse both. They also endorsed 10 other land use code amendments specific to wind energy, as well as one that dealt with minor grammar changes throughout the entire land use document and one shoreland zoning change required by the state. A copy of the changes are available at the town hall.

Eric Johns, Planning Board chairman, said that removing the hunting camp line from the town ordinance would be placed on the board’s April agenda.

At the annual meeting, residents endorsed:

1. Moving $190,000 from the unappropriated surplus account to reduce taxes.
2. Moving $34,819 in state revenue sharing to reduce taxes. The revenue sharing amount is $11,994 less than last year, according to town figures.
3. Municipal building expenses of $7,800, unchanged.
4. Administrative compensation and expenses of $90,850, an increase of $7,380.
5. Town expenses totaling $26,300, a decrease of $3,197.
6. Professional services of $15,000, an increase of $250.
7. Fire protection and streetlights, $24,500, an increase of $1,000.
8. Waste disposal expenses of $66,433, an increase of $5,608.
9. General road maintenance, $46,000, unchanged.
10. Winter road maintenance, $78,000, unchanged.
11. Organizations, $7,445, a decrease of $20.
12. General assistance, $1,000, unchanged.

The meeting was held Saturday afternoon after the local election polls closed that morning.

Write-in candidate and incumbent Julie Clewley, who is chairwoman of the town selectmen, earned another three years on the panel by tallying 91 votes during local elections held Saturday morning, according to unofficial election results provided by the town clerk.

Clewley and board newcomer John Williams, who took in 80 votes, were selected by residents to fill the two open selectmen seats. They beat out residents Peter Beckford, who earned 77 votes, and Eric Jellison, with 37 votes.

Jessica Gray, who ran unopposed for her SAD 63 board seat, tallied 135 votes to earn another three-year term.

Source:  By Nok-Noi Ricker, BDN Staff, Bangor Daily News, bangordailynews.com 20 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky