LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bill would place two-year moratorium on new wind farms 

Credit:  By Dustin Hurst, Idaho Reporter, www.idahoreporter.com 13 March 2011 ~~

A new plan introduced last week in the House State Affairs Committee would place a two-year moratorium on the creation of new wind energy farms in the Gem State.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Erik Simpson, R-Idaho Falls, is a move to ensure that Idahoans aren’t footing the bill for more expensive electricity. At the hearing on the measure, Simpson told his colleagues that while he supports renewable energy, wind farms may be responsible for rate hikes in some areas of the Gem State.

Simpson, in an interview with IdahoReporter.com Friday, said that large corporations – like General Electric – are taking advantage of a federal law, 1978′s Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA), by forming small wind farms around Idaho.

PURPA, Simpson said, requires large power utilities across the state to purchase electricity generated from renewable sources if they meet certain thresholds. Simpson explained that by forming many smaller, “bite-sized” wind farms across the state, billion-dollar companies are qualifying for the thresholds and causing spikes in electricity rates because wind costs more to generate. ”Energy developers are gaming the system,” said Simpson.

The bill would not effect already-approved wind farms. Also exempt would be farmers and private citizens using windmills to generate power for private use. The legislation would require environmental studies [ends]

Source:  By Dustin Hurst, Idaho Reporter, www.idahoreporter.com 13 March 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky