LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm debate focuses on commission's role 

Supporters and opponents of a proposed Nantucket Sound wind farm sparred yesterday over the extent of the Cape Cod Commission’s jurisdiction over the project.

In the coming months, the commission, the Cape’s regional planning organization, will be reviewing Cape Wind’s proposal to build 130 wind turbines in Nantucket Sound.

But the scope of that review is up for debate. Yesterday, the agency held a public meeting at Barnstable Town Hall to gather testimony on its proper role.

The turbines would be erected in federal waters. But the transmission cable would run through state waters, which extend 3 miles out from the shore, and would cross state-owned land as well.

The debate was whether the commission’s review should focus just on the impact of the cable that crosses state property and waters, or look at the project as a whole.

Wind farm opponents argued that the commission should interpret its jurisdiction broadly. Fishing and navigational concerns cross state and federal boundaries, they said.

And a spill from a planned 40,000-gallon oil tank, which would hold oil to cool the project’s transformers, would impact state lands, they argued.

“If you don’t take the broad view,” said Jaci Barton, executive director of the Barnstable Land Trust, “no one on Cape Cod will take the broad view.”

But David S. Rosenzweig, an attorney for Cape Wind Associates, the Boston-based company behind the proposal, said enabling legislation for the commission limits their jurisdiction to state land and waters only.

Barbara Hill, executive director of Clean Power Now, which supports the project, noted that Ian Bowles, Massachusetts’ environmental affairs secretary, said the Cape Cod Commission’s jurisdiction was limited when he signed off on the Cape Wind project’s environmental impact report in March, delivering a significant victory to supporters. In the wake of that decision, opponents are pushing the commission to become a local bulwark against the project.

The commission is expected to identify what it believes to be the scope of its jurisdiction at its next meeting, May 31. That interpretation could be subject to legal challenge by either side.

A critical federal review of the project is due at the end of the summer.

David Scharfenberg
Staff Writer

Cape Cod Times

capecodonline.com

18 May 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon