LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Action needed to deny wind farm permits 

Credit:  By CATHARINE SCHAIDLE, Journal Star, www.pjstar.com 18 February 2011 ~~

EUREKA – The Woodford County Board has learned it can’t stop issuing new wind farm permits without going through the legal process.

In January, the County Board voted 10-5 to temporarily halt issuing new wind farm permits until Sept. 21, pending a decision by new State’s Attorney Greg Minger on whether the move was legal.

That action had been recommended by the comprehensive planning and zoning committee. At Tuesday’s County Board meeting, however, committee chairman Doug Huser said Minger had concluded the board could not take that action.

There was no further discussion.

The board had not turned down any wind farm permits since passing the resolution.

“There is no authority to suspend or revoke a zoning ordinance unless you go through the process to amend or repeal a zoning ordinance,” Minger told the Journal Star on Friday. “That starts with filing an application with the (Zoning Board of Appeals.)”

Minger said any new applicant for a wind farm permit will have to be informed that changes to the zoning permit are in the works.

“So instead of doing a suspension, what is required is a notice to someone who takes out a permit that changes are occurring,” Minger said.

The committee is reviewing the county’s wind farm ordinance. It meets weekly and invites public input. The next meeting is set for 4 p.m. Tuesday.

Any subsequent action the board may take regarding that ordinance would have no bearing on the agreements with the Minonk and Roanoke wind farms.

Source:  By CATHARINE SCHAIDLE, Journal Star, www.pjstar.com 18 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky