LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No Brimfield Wind wants local control 

Credit:  By Kevin Flanders, Southbridge Evening News, Stonebridge Press & Villager Newspapers, www.southbridgeeveningnews.com 15 February 2011 ~~

BRIMFIELD – Members of No Brimfield Wind have carefully monitored the activities of the state Legislature in its new session, keeping their eyes peeled for the expected refiling of the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act.

No Brimfield Wind is a group of residents who oppose Boston-based First Wind’s proposal to construct eight to 10 wind turbines on West Mountain along the ridge near Steerage Rock. Some of the turbines would be nearly 10,000 feet in length, and residents have expressed concerns since learning about the proposal in June 2010.

Back in September, the group was pleased by the Board of Selectmen’s unanimous vote to reject First Wind’s offer to pay the town $30,000 for a detailed study of the project. Selectmen received 181 letters from residents asking them not to accept the money, according to Virginia Irvine, one of the organizers of No Brimfield Wind.

“Many people spoke out against the proposal at that September meeting, and I thought it showed how most of the town feels about an industrial wind project,” Irvine said.

The Wind Energy Siting Reform Act, which was not passed before the conclusion of the previous legislative session in July, is supported by Gov. Deval Patrick and many members of the Senate and House of Representatives. As a result, many residents are anticipating that the bill will be refiled soon, although they hope the new version of the bill features language that will allow for increased local control.

For more on this story, please see tomorrow’s Southbridge Evening News.

Source:  By Kevin Flanders, Southbridge Evening News, Stonebridge Press & Villager Newspapers, www.southbridgeeveningnews.com 15 February 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky