LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Voters to get a say on wind power in Antrim 

Credit:  By Abby Spegman, Sentinel Staff, The Keene Sentinel, sentinelsource.com 25 January 2011 ~~

ANTRIM – While the fight over proposed windmills on Tuttle Hill heads to court, a zoning amendment on wind energy will appear on March’s town meeting warrant.

The amendment, which spells out where wind energy facilities are allowed, was trimmed down at a public hearing last week.

The planning board had looked to make wind energy a permitted use in about two-thirds of town.

At the hearing Thursday, the board scaled this back to just two zoning district types – highway business and rural conservation.

“These are the places in town that would be viable for a wind energy facility,” said Peter Moore, town planner.

That would still include Tuttle Hill, where Portsmouth-based Eolian Renewable Energy proposes installing up to 10 industrial-sized turbines, which can be more than 400 feet tall. (Eolian has not said how tall its turbines would be.)

The change to town zoning law was proposed in an effort to avoid a repeat of the current debate over Tuttle Hill. Residents are now suing the town to prevent the project from going through. Eolian, meanwhile, is suing the town to see that it does.

The amendment wouldn’t make this or future projects a sure thing, Moore said, but clarify town law.

“(It’s) not a rubber stamp for permitting a project,” he said.

The board also narrowed the scope of the amendment from renewable energy facilities to wind energy only.

The competing lawsuits will be heard sometime after April 1, according to Moore.

Source:  By Abby Spegman, Sentinel Staff, The Keene Sentinel, sentinelsource.com 25 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky