LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Woodford revisits wind farm permits 

Credit:  By CATHARINE SCHAIDLE, JournalStar, www.pjstar.com 18 January 2011 ~~

EUREKA – Wind farms remain a hot button issue in Woodford County.

On Tuesday night, the County Board voted 10-5 to pass a resolution to temporarily halt issuing new wind farm permits until Sept. 21, pending the state’s attorney’s decision on the legality of the resolution.

Voting in favor of the resolution were Shannon Rocke, Duane Kingdon, John Krug, Doug Huser, Stan Glazier, Tom Evans, Tom Karr, Don Cremeens, Russ Cotton and Barry Logan. Voting against the measure were Larry Whitaker, Mike Hinrichsen, Andrew Martin, Terry Pille and Tom Janssen.

It was noted that any subsequent action the board would take would have no bearing on the existing agreements with the Minonk and Roanoke wind farms.

This resolution to halt any more wind farm permits was brought forward by the county’s conservation, planning and zoning committee, which has some members who have strenuously opposed the wind farm ordinance in the past couple of years.

Rocke said the measure was not an assault on wind farms but was about property rights and how the ordinance offered no protection for people who lived close to a wind farm.

“Property rights is a big deal,” Rocke said.

The committee plans to review the ordinance on wind farms including the length of the setbacks, taking the height of the towers into consideration, among other things.

Huser said the committee would meet every week on Tuesdays and invited public input to revise the ordinance.

“We’re going to meet on Tuesday with no per diems, no mileage, on our own time and I welcome everybody to come in and do this right,” he said.

Pille and others argued the resolution probably was not legal and wanted the state’s attorney to rule on it. Special State’s Attorney Pete Dluski said he didn’t feel comfortable giving an opinion without consulting new State’s Attorney Greg Minger, who was appointed to the post Tuesday night.

Source:  By CATHARINE SCHAIDLE, JournalStar, www.pjstar.com 18 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky