LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

State’s energy bill poses threat to pristine landscape 

Credit:  The Boston Globe, www.boston.com 7 January 2011 ~~

The Wind Energy Siting Reform bill, which the Globe supports, might add a few windmills to Central and Western Massachusetts, but at great cost (“In clean tech, governor has led, but more needs to be done,’’ Editorial, Jan. 4). This bill offers a shortcut around the state’s Wetlands Protection Act to encourage building windmills on virgin mountains.

The spectacular landscapes of Central and Western Massachusetts entice tourists because so many mountains remain untouched. Erecting and servicing windmills would require major truck routes winding around each mountain. Since lovely streams run down the sides of these virgin mountains, windmill farms want special treatment under the Wetlands Protection Act for their roads to cross and recross those streams.

Windmills should go on mountains that already have roads, principally ski resorts. It’s true that ski resort owners would expect compensation and noise control. Those are reasonable demands. The wind industry should not be encouraged to evade them by destroying virgin mountains.

The Globe touts municipalities’ right to object, not realizing that municipalities are often in bed with developers. A poor town will do anything for a buck, ignoring the concerns of its neighbors and its own long-term interest in preserving the scenery.

Sue Bass
Belmont

Source:  The Boston Globe, www.boston.com 7 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky