LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Burleigh accepts less rigid wind farm policy 

Credit:  LeAnn Eckroth/Bismarck Tribune, www.bismarcktribune.com 5 January 2011 ~~

The Burleigh County Commission breezed through revisions to its wind farm policy Wednesday, approving five major wording changes to its permit policy that officials said would make it more flexible.

Commissioner Mark Armstrong voted no on all five changes, which were approved in separate 4-1 votes.

They would move certain requirements from the special use permit phase to the building permit phase:

n Identifying existing and proposed access points on public-right-of-ways of a wind project.

n Listing roadway names, and type of width surfacing of a road on public right-of-way. Locations of public roads within 500 feet of turbine must still be listed in the special use permit applications.

n Listing wind turbine fixtures, accessory buildings, meteorological towers, electrical infrastructure or transmission lines within 500 feet of a turbine.

Parks, boat ramps, swimming beaches and recreation within 3,000 feet of a turbine must be named in the special use permit application.

n Giving locations and dimensions of proposed utility easements, easements for storm water management facilities, culverts and retention/detention areas.

n Listing boundaries of filed lease easements or options to wind energy facilities.

NextEra Energy, the company that is expected to be the first applicant to use the county’s first wind energy policy, made the requests for change. Commissioners reviewed all 31 items in the policy and allowed a handful to move to the building permit stage.

Although the county approved a wind policy in April, NextEra contested several data items required in the special use permit process. The company said the information collected was same as the company uses for building permit applications. NextEra found the data requests both too expensive and repetitive.

Newly named Commission Chairman Brian Bitner proposed more simple wording on several items kept in the special use permit stage. The changes would give more general locations of where a turbine will be near participating homes, non-participating homes and roads.

Wording changes now let an applicant to collect more information from public records.

One of NextEra’s projects was proposed to cross into Crofte Township near Baldwin. It falls into Burleigh County jurisdiction.

In late December, the commission also adjusted how applicants pay wind energy fees. It now allows only a $1,000 application fee to be paid up front and the balance of the fees to be paid during the building permit phase.

The formula still requires an applicant be charged one-tenth of 1 percent of the entire cost of the turbines.

Armstrong said he opposed the wind policy changes because they didn’t involve public comment other than from NextEra officials, unlike earlier county commission and planning commission meetings.

“We already acted on them. I believe the process tonight was completely circumvented,” he said.

Armstrong said NextEra has never applied for its permit in the eight months since the county approved the wind policy.

Bitner said the changes made the county’s wind policy more flexible.

“I think because it’s more business-friendly. We had it just too rigid. The cost of doing business in Burleigh County for that type of company was too high,” he said.

Source:  LeAnn Eckroth/Bismarck Tribune, www.bismarcktribune.com 5 January 2011

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky