LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

How does your windmill turn now? 

Credit:  By Robert Brems Sr., Coshocton Tribune, www.coshoctontribune.com 22 December 2010 ~~

When I saw that photo of the ice-encrusted lighthouse at Cleveland’s Lake Erie harbor entrance in Saturday’s paper and on the Internet, the first thing that came to my mind was, “What a great place for a series of wind turbines.” I can only imagine that the renewable energy visionaries who are touting eastern Lake Erie as the future home of an Ohio wind farm were thinking the same thing. The wind was really great last week. Those wind turbines would be generating their designed output for sure – if they weren’t frozen solid.

Maybe it is just me, but I have trouble taking a wind farm seriously along the shore or somewhat offshore of eastern Lake Erie. Things like lake effect snow and that lighthouse picture just seem to scream at me, “Don’t do that!” I’d think the engineers and electric utility planners would come to the same conclusion; however, it seems that green-colored glasses have a way of obliterating common sense. Of course, there is a lot of money available out there to chase pipe dreams in the pursuit of greenness, and many are happy to take that money to the bank.

As I’ve written before, Ohio is just not a place where wind energy or solar energy has any chance of being a sensible major electricity source. However, the key term here is sensible. It is certainly possible to provide about 6 percent of Ohio’s electricity from renewable, Ohio-based, energy sources by 2025 as required by Senate Bill 221 passed in 2008. However, the cost to do that will be high, and electricity consumers and/or the taxpayer will have to pay for it one way or another. Hopefully, we will have the sense and courage to learn from our European friends who have already been down this road and are drastically cutting back their government subsidies for renewable energy-generated electricity because consumers are balking at the cost.

I don’t know if Gov.-elect Kasich has revisiting Senate Bill 221 on his to-do list, but in my mind it is a no-brainer, just as scuttling the low speed 3-C rail line was.

Robert Brems Sr. is a former citizen member of the Coshocton Tribune Editorial Board.

Source:  By Robert Brems Sr., Coshocton Tribune, www.coshoctontribune.com 22 December 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky