LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Beauty or pollution? 

Credit:  Chicago Tribune, www.chicagotribune.com 24 November 2010 ~~

After reading Victor Janus Jr.’s letter (“Future energy,” Nov. 15), I finally understand the concept of perception. Where he saw beauty, I see visual pollution. For over 40 years, I have traveled I-65 between the Chicago area and Indianapolis. The area of northern White County, the site of this wind farm, was a beautiful, scenic rural area, especially in the autumn. Now there are hundreds of structures (covering about 50 square miles) that can only be described as ugly. They remind me of something Picasso might have dreamed up when investigating new ways to contort the human body.

One nuclear power plant could be constructed that would produce more power than this wind farm, take up a vastly smaller footprint, emit no carbon dioxide (just like windmills) and restore the scenic nature to our open spaces.

The people of Martha’s Vineyard opposed such an off-shore wind farm even though it would have been barely visible from land. At the time, I thought it was just a bunch of eastern elites telling the rest of the country to live as we say, and not as we do. After seeing this wind farm in Indiana, I am convinced that they were correct. Their stand against visual pollution from wind farms should become the norm throughout the United States.

— Vance Gregory Jr., Wheaton

Source:  Chicago Tribune, www.chicagotribune.com 24 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky