LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind-farm developer to plead case at state level 

Credit:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 11 November 2010 ~~

ST. PAUL – The AWA Goodhue wind project is scheduled for final discussion before the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission on Nov. 23.

The commission will decide whether to allow a rehearing of National Wind’s controversial 78-megawatt project in Goodhue County. Lawyers for the company outlined their reasons for a rehearing in a 28-page document that was filed last week.

After the county adopted a stringent, 10-rotor setback for properties not participating the project, the commission ruled on Oct. 21 that the project needed further review by an administrative law judge. That process is expected to take about six months, which throws a wrench into financial planning for National Wind, the project developer.

“The long document that went out last week requesting reconsideration contains pretty much all of our reasoning and our backup,” National Wind communications director Joe Jennings said. “I don’t think there’s any reason for us to necessarily submit any more information. Obviously, this is something where we’re happy they responded quickly, and we’re happy to be getting a hearing where they’ll consider to reconsider their decision.”

Chuck Burdick, senior wind developer with National Wind, says his biggest concerns are that “the excessive rules are unnecessary to protect health and safety” and that “a county should not be able to impose de facto prohibition on energy development.”

Source:  By Brett Boese, The Post-Bulletin, www.postbulletin.com 11 November 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky