LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind energy not the answer 

Credit:  The Peterborough Examiner, www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com 15 October 2010 ~~

Re “Why this backlash against safe windpower?” (Letter, Oct. 13) –

Perhaps Joan Reeves does not realize the industrial wind turbines are not the quaint, picturesque “windmills” of old. The 460 to 480-foot-tall industrial wind turbines proposed for the Hastings, Millbrook, Bethany and Pontypool areas are not benign “wind generators.”

Ms. Reeves may not realize that industrial wind turbines are not an “environmentally friendly method of generating power in a harmless way.” Due to the unpredictability of wind, to keep the power grid balanced we always have to have another power source to back up industrial wind turbines. Normally the back-up is a fossil fuel burning plant (either coal or natural gas). The back-up plants running at about 80% of their usual efficiency emit much higher amounts of greenhouse gases than they would when running at full efficiency.

The May 2010 Chief Medical Officer of Health for Ontario literature review stated, ” . . . while some people living near wind turbines report symptoms such as dizziness, headaches, and sleep disturbance, the scientific evidence available to date does not demonstrate a direct causal link between wind turbine noise and adverse health effects.” The key phrase is “available to date.” Clearly stated, scientific epidemiological studies have not yet been conducted.

Kelly Campbell, director and project manager for Energy Farming Ontario Inc. was quoted as stating, “Nobody ever claimed that wind was the answer to our energy needs.” Finally, we are given a truthful statement from an EFO representative regarding a proposed industrial wind turbine project.

I agree with Kelly Campbell on this one: wind energy is not the answer to our energy needs.

DEBBIE LYNCH

RR 2, Norwood

Source:  The Peterborough Examiner, www.thepeterboroughexaminer.com 15 October 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky