LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Noise, open space are wind farm issues in Bourne 

Credit:  By Paul Gately, BOURNE COURIER, www.wickedlocal.com 30 September 2010 ~~

BOURNE – The Cape Cod Commission subcommittee reviewing the New Generation Wind turbine project proposed for Bournedale told the public Monday night its scrutiny would be complete and far from “speedy” before any recommendation is issued.

The wind farm proposal continues to be described as like none other in the annals of agency regulatory review. Commission staffers remain concerned about the appearance of the seven-turbines proposed off Scenic Highway by Tudor Ingersoll of Buzzards Bay and Cape Cod Aggregates owner Samuel Lorusso.

The project that could affect the Pilgrim Pines, Nightingale Pond Estates and Heather Hill subdivisions.

Commission staffers said the proposal is within the village area of a District of Critical Planning Concern, which seeks to protect rural and scenic characteristics of the area.

Atlantic Design, consultants to New Wind, revised their early photo simulations of the proposed turbines to more accurately reflect the scale of the structures in relation to their surroundings.

John Lipman of Lipman Development Strategies, a consultant working for the developers, told the agency the turbines would more or less harmoniously coexist with electric utility facilities already in place, saying in effect that Bournedale is less than scenic as suggested by proposal critics.

“This is certainly not a pristine area, but rather a well developed area with many uses, much traffic and utility easements,” Lipman said. “It is important to say that is not something being foisted on the area but rather a solution leading Cape Cod in terms of achieving alternative energy.”

Lipman said his clients, however, would be willing to work with abutters to address their concerns about the 492-foot turbines; something that would carry over to Bourne Planning Board regulatory review of venture as well.

No glaring flaw seems to have evolved in project planning. But New Wind consultants and Commission staffers disagree about the amount of open space that must be set aside at the wind farm tract. The consultants are arguing for 4.6 acres, saying disturbed land will revert to its natural state after turbine construction.

The agency, however, seeks 18.6 acres, saying the disturbed area is land being used commercially; something Lipman and company hope to reverse in the final decision-making and recommendation to the full Commission.

“The project is typically not a commercial use,” Lipman said. “The disturbed land will be restored. This project is something different than any other reviewed by the Commission. We are using the wind, not the land; so we seek flexibility in terms of open space.”

Bourne Town Planner Coreen Moore said the proposal complies with zoning and local comprehensive planning goals. Bourne Energy Coordinator Richard Elrick said the project would benefit the entire town and region; and that the town supports it.

James Mulvey of Buzzards Bay said a few town committees might indeed support the proposal but the general populace may not, prompting Elrick to quickly tell the Commission that he was speaking personally.

Board of health member Galon “Skip” Barlow said his panel has taken no position on the proposal and urged the Commission not to issue a ruling until local review of public health and environment concerns still to be unveiled are addressed.

“Don’t rush into any decision until the issues are resolved,” Barlow said. “This is not a green technology park. It won’t employ people in the end. It is a project to make a handful of people some money.”

Selectman Stephen Mealy said he supports alternative energy efforts but listed three concerns: what happens with the turbines after 25 years of usage, the analysis and subjective quantification of turbine noise data and the location of some structures less than 1,000 feet from homes.

Pilgrim Pines residents assembled a program to delineate for the Commission its main concern about the Ingersoll/Lorusso proposal; notably noise impacting their neighborhood between Nightingale Pond and the Ingersoll tract.

Source:  By Paul Gately, BOURNE COURIER, www.wickedlocal.com 30 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon