LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Sea Girt wind turbine plan creating angst for residents 

Credit:  By GRAELYN BRASHEAR, Staff Writer, Asbury Park Press, www.app.com 15 September 2010 ~~

SEA GIRT – The 325-foot-tall wind turbine planned for the New Jersey National Guard Training Camp is generating controversy in nearby communities, and state Department of Environmental Protection rules could threaten the federally funded project.

The DEP’s Large Scale Wind Turbine Siting Map Report, released in 2009, designates the beaches that front Sea Girt, Manasquan and the training camp as areas where turbines taller than 200 feet are “unacceptable due to the operational impacts of the turbines on birds and bats.”

The report says a turbine must be set back at least 1,312 feet from the nesting sites of endangered piping plovers, which regularly nest on the training camp’s beaches.

But DEP spokesman Larry Raganese said the 2009 report does not preclude the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, which is in charge of the project at the training camp, from applying for permits to build a turbine.

“It’s a difficult area to place a turbine, but they have every right to apply for it and every right to ask us to consider their application if they do come to us,” Raganese said. “The ball’s in their court. If they want to come forward, they can.”

Raganese said he could not say what specific mitigating factors might make the DEP allow a large-scale turbine on a site it already has said should be protected.

“At this point, we can’t speculate on what could be allowed or what might be allowed because we don’t have their application,” he said.

Patrick L. Daugherty, spokesman for the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, said his department was aware of the DEP report when it began planning for the turbine project, but is conducting its own independent studies on wind and wildlife, which will be completed next spring.

The studies, which measure the force of the wind in the area and the number and frequency of bird and bat flyovers, are “totally unbiased,” Daugherty said. “We’ll collect the data, and it will be assessed by the authorities. We’re doing this project by the numbers, and we’re not rushing it.”

The department intends for the 1.5-megawatt turbine to power the training camp, making it energy independent.

The turbine was originally thought to be more than 400 feet tall, but Daugherty said the structure would top out at 325 feet, including the rotor blade.

The project is expected to cost about $5 million and will be paid for by the U.S. Department of Defense.

Daugherty said the wind study – which will reveal whether a turbine would be appropriately efficient at the site – is being conducted by Rowan University and will cost $50,000. It is being paid for with money from solar energy credits earned through solar panels installed at Fort Dix, he said.

A private company contracted by the Army Corps of Engineers is conducting the bird and bat study, which will ultimately cost approximately $700,000, Daugherty said. That money is coming from the federal National Guard Bureau, which is part of the Department of Defense.

Meanwhile, officials in Manasquan have joined their counterparts in Sea Girt in opposing the project.

On Monday, the Manasquan Borough Council passed a resolution stating its members feel the proposed turbine would be too close to homes, schools and other buildings, Manasquan Mayor George Dempsey said.

Sea Girt passed a similar resolution last week.

“We have our Little League fields down there,” Dempsey said, “and we have houses right there. It’s not the place for it.”

Source:  By GRAELYN BRASHEAR, Staff Writer, Asbury Park Press, www.app.com 15 September 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon