LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind farm firm want extension 

Credit:  www.getwokingham.co.uk 19 August 2010 ~~

The firm wanting to build a wind farm between Arborfield and Earley is requesting a device used to measure wind speed be kept on site a further 18 months.

Partnerships for Renewables (PfR) has filed plans with Wokingham Borough Council asking for an extension to the time it is allowed to keep a 70-metre high anemometer on land close to the site for the proposed wind farm at Rushy Mead.

In 2008, PfR was granted permission by the authority to install the device at Underwood Farm, which is south of Lower Earley Way and adjacent to Rushy Mead, so tests could be carried out on local wind speeds.

However, in allowing the anemometer to be installed the council imposed a condition requiring the tool to be removed from the site within two years of it being fitted.

This means it must be removed, and the site returned to its former condition, by December.

PfR is asking for an 18-month extension, until June 2012, so the wind can be monitored until any decision is made regarding the proposed four turbine wind farm.

An application for the development is expected to be with the council this autumn.

In a letter accompanying PfR’s application, Marcus Beddoe, head of planning and technical services, said: “Whilst sufficient wind speed data has been collected to confirm the wind resource at the site, the applicant wishes to continue monitoring the wind regime for a further period until a project for a wind energy development on adjoining land is complete.”

Source:  www.getwokingham.co.uk 19 August 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky