LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Tyranny of the turbine 

Credit:  High Country News, www.hcn.org 15 March 2010 ~~

I am a farmer in southwest Minnesota, and live very near an intersection of the Northern Border natural gas pipeline and a major electricity transmission line. Three hundred megawatts’-worth of wind turbines have already been installed here, and at least 300 MW more are in the permitting and development stage (HCN, 12/21/09 & 1/4/10).

I am now in deep conflict within my own noggin. I thought that I would welcome the turbines. I now hate them while at the same time I am fascinated by them.

My landscape has changed drastically. Open space, one of the remarkable qualities of this tall-grass prairie converted to corn production, is gone. We are now in a forest of blinking, whirling, whining, flashing towers.

I read of the love affair with wind every place from Whole Foods to the Union of Concerned Scientists (who unscientifically call wind turbines “noiseless”) and I am embarrassed by the general naivete. This is how Mr. Ponzi made a living. There is a tyranny of the turbine sweeping the rural landscape.

I have not yet been able to find a believable, juried journal article that describes the externalities of wind electricity in a “lifecycle analysis” with anything like the rigor that I have seen for the biomass production technologies. What does a kilowatt hour from differing sources really cost when we draw a BIG circle around our activities?

The turbines only operate when the wind blows, and as I understand it, the nation’s best wind quality leads to a product that is less than 40 percent of rated capacity. Add to that the distributed generation and the transmission costs and the 300 to 500 cubic yards of concrete under each turbine, (another 1 to 2 million pounds of material to be schlepped around the West) and the picture becomes much less rosy. The crane that installs the generator weighs about a million pounds and arrives on 20 or so semis and a fleet of smaller trucks.

This “green” energy is only slightly, if at all, less “brown,” and I am disturbed by the ridiculous love affair with wind. Public and ecological policy is not keeping up with the wind boom.

James A. Thompson
Windom, Minnesota

Source:  High Country News, www.hcn.org 15 March 2010

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon