LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbine debate widens Glenmore race 

A formerly uncontested race for town of Glenmore chairman picked up another candidate after a meeting last week in which the Town Board approved a conditional-use permit to put eight wind turbines on land in the town.

Incumbent chairman Don Kittell now faces a challenge from Lee Gossen, who decided to run after last week’s meeting when the three-member Town Board unanimously approved a conditional-use permit for Emerging Energies/Shirley Wind LLC of Hubertus to put eight 2.75-megawatt, 492-foot turbines on land owned by four families.

Gossen said he didn’t feel the board listened to the concerns of residents at the meeting regarding wind turbines.

“Nobody was listened to,” Gossen said. “The Town Board appeared to just roll over and accepted the provisions of the wind power company. The people around here feel like this got jammed down their throat, they just wanted at the very least debate on it, their questions answered.”

Gossen, a 39-year-old dairy farmer who said he ran for the chairman’s seat in the past, said he was one of the people who attended Monday’s meeting.

The Green Bay Press-Gazette was unable to reach Kittell for comment.

“I started the write-in campaign to see if my feelings about what is going on are right,” Gossen said Saturday afternoon. “If Wednesday morning I wake up and Don is town chairman, then I guess I’m wrong. But if I get the votes “¦ things are going to change, these people are going to get listened to and they’re going to have their say.”

He said he went to the meeting with no real issue with the turbines, but the board’s actions spurred him to consider a bid for office.

“There was no dialogue, they didn’t want to listen,” he said. “It’s not a vengeful thing, I just want people to have a choice.”

By Nathan Phelps

greenbaypressgazette.com

2 April 2007

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky