LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind costly, kills wildlife, damages environment 

Credit:  Written by Tammy C. Truitt | July 1, 2013 | www.delmarvanow.com ~~

The reality of wind is it cannot replace any form of energy.

It is unaffordable, kills wildlife and damages our environment.

The single turbine to be built in Crisfield will lose $1.6 million.

With a whopping price tag of $3.6 million, the town hopes to save $2 million in electricity costs ($200,000 times 10 years).

That is, of course, if the turbine lasts that long, if the wind blows that much and if and operational costs are zero.

Sadly, achieving a loss of $1.6 million is a best-case scenario that requires optimum performance.

Manufacturer warranties only cover the first two years of operations. Many turbines cannot sustain the stresses created by the massive 150-foot blades that weigh in excess of 6 tons.

Gearboxes have to be rebuilt, blades break apart and are thrown, and toxic oil leaks.

Mechanical malfunctions are well-documented and create risks to public health and safety (www.nationalwindwatch).

The turbines’ placement guarantees optimum risk that a catastrophic failure will have disastrous results.

A study was commissioned by the Renewable Energy Foundation, an organization that promotes renewable energy. This study verified that even with proper maintenance, the depreciating performance of aging equipment downgrades the life expectancy of industrial wind turbines to a mere 10 to 15 years.

Who pays for a project that has been designated to lose $1.6 million?

It is us – the taxpayers and electric ratepayers.

The hosting community pays in the form of reduced property values, loss of wildlife, environmental damage and noise pollution.

With massive projects proposed for Somerset County, wind is the Ponzi scheme of our day.

These projects cannot stand on their own without the backing of unsuspecting citizens.

Looks like the dirty joke is on us, while wind developers are laughing all the way to the bank and naïve politicians clamor for political favor.

Ask questions, get the facts about wind.

Tammy C. Truitt lives in Marion Station.

Source:  Written by Tammy C. Truitt | July 1, 2013 | www.delmarvanow.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky