LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Disappointed by approval of Lee wind farm 

Credit:  June 11, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com ~~

On May 21, the Lee County Board voted against its own Zoning Board of Appeals and approved a special use permit for Green River Wind Farm.

The Zoning Board voted to deny the petition because it failed to follow multiple Lee County ordinances and rules, including to enhance and protect the health, welfare and safety of residents. Coincidentally, that same statement is the first thing you see when you go to the county board’s webpage, right above Mr. Ketchum’s picture.

The petition was approved with eight additional conditions attached. Strangely enough, those conditions were already printed up and handed to a member of the board who made the initial motion. This board member was recognized even though Marilyn Shippert was standing up waiting to be recognized by the chair. It definitely appeared to the crowd that this had all been arranged behind closed doors out of the public’s view.

The crowd seemed to know at this point that the chair’s votes were all in line to pass the petition. If you paid attention to the first thing that happened in the meeting, before the wind energy conversion systems vote, Mr. Considine, a first-year member, was appointed to the finance committee, one of the better committee appointments. He voted with Mr. Ketchum’s gang of 12. Are those two things connected? I have no idea.

Mr. Ketchum’s gang of 12 doesn’t appear to have any setbacks that would protect residents or any wildlife areas in this project. This vote also does not appear to hold Mainstream to anything that was promised during hearings. One of the conditions says it is only going to log and investigate complaints related to the wind energy conversion systems; in other words, not do anything.

Thank you to the nine members who voted to deny.

Betsy Hartmann LaMoille

Source:  June 11, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky