LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Acceptable bribery? Local communities offered £100k a year for wind farms 

Credit:  By Alex Stevenson | 6 June 2013 | www.politics.co.uk ~~

Local communities are to be bribed to accept onshore wind farms with cheaper energy bills.

The Department for Energy and Climate Change is to quintuple the benefits paid by developers to communities in a bid to win more local support for the construction of new wind turbines.

Efforts to win over communities will also see the views of local communities sought earlier as part of a shake-up in the planning process making it easier for opponents of wind farms to challenge new onshore projects.

“The planning guidance is to be clarified to ensure that the visual impact of turbines, the cumulative impact of turbines and local factors are taken more clearly into account before consent is given,” energy minister Michael Fallon told the Commons.

A bitter struggle is currently underway between campaigners worried about the environmental impact of wind turbines and green activists keen to see the expansion of Britain’s renewable energy capacity.

Energy and climate change secretary Ed Davey secured additional funding for renewable energy in a coalition deal agreed last autumn which saw the government reject the early setting of a decarbonisation target for 2030.

Now ministers are moving to make it easier for local communities to say ‘no’ to onshore wind turbine developments by updating planning guidance to give greater weight to landscape and visual impact concerns.

It follows the decision to cut financial support for the development of onshore wind capacity by ten per cent from April this year.

“It is important that onshore wind is developed in a way that is truly sustainable – economically, environmentally and socially,” Davey said.

“Today’s announcement will ensure that communities see the windfall from hosting developments near to them, not just the wind farm.

“We remain committed to the deployment of appropriately sited onshore wind, as a key part of a diverse, low-carbon and secure energy mix and committed to an evidence-based approach to supporting low carbon power.”

The updating guidance also downplays the importance of developing renewable energy by clarifying that moves towards its development do not automatically override environmental protections.

Pre-application consultation with local communities is being made compulsory as a result. A new register will monitor best practice among onshore wind developers.

Meanwhile the recommended community benefit package in England is being increased fivefold from £1,000 per MW of installed capacity to £5,000 per MW. Government officials estimate the benefits package for a medium-sized farm could be worth £100,000 a year, or £400 a year off each household’s annual bill.

Moves to incentivise local communities to accept the downsides of new energy sources like onshore wind or shale gas are critical, the chair of the Commons’ energy and climate change committee said.

“I think people will get more used to all these things and they may also see where the overriding national need is,” Tim Yeo told Politics.co.uk in an interview yesterday.

“They could be persuaded to see that perhaps more clearly if they are offered a more direct share of the benefits.”

The government will provide more details of its plans to win over communities will be published in a strategy document expected this autumn.

Source:  By Alex Stevenson | 6 June 2013 | www.politics.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky